Wednesday, November 23, 2016

+72 (second amendment interpretation 50)

I was thinking whether the use of "being" was intended to point out the externality of the fact and the focus on slicing that time period follow passively and how that could fit if my other posts seems to put suggesting the later in the forefront. But earlier than this I was already thinking how mistaking what is the base for what could be more a positive sign instead of negative because of its suggestion that there is a real structure you are trying to disassemble and present in parts. Thinking about how the "being" here is the equivalent to somebody explaining to another that this is his situation made me see that I could be trying to get too close and overdo the disassembling here. When a person explains to another "this is my situation" should he be taken to refer to the externality of the situation or the effect of current time? Or is it that the two come together as one whole?

No comments: