Continuing from the preceding post
I need first to bring attention to something I have been describing incorrectly or at least potentially misleadingly for a long time and have just noticed. While most, if not all of my related arguments still fit because they were made in contrast with the purpose of the amendment being empowerment, it was a mistake, at least without proper caution, to take preserving the militia being a purpose behind the amendment as equal to the mere existence of the militia itself being a purpose.
Having said that lets continue:
Moreover before considering how probable preserving the militia being a purpose, shouldn't it be first convincingly explained how that can be served through the action required by the amendment? The explanation provided by the court leaves one speechless because of how far it is from even the neighborhood of satisfying that.
Also lets not forget, the points here are in addition to what follows from the arms clause being always applicable if preserving the militia being a purpose leads to that.
I need first to bring attention to something I have been describing incorrectly or at least potentially misleadingly for a long time and have just noticed. While most, if not all of my related arguments still fit because they were made in contrast with the purpose of the amendment being empowerment, it was a mistake, at least without proper caution, to take preserving the militia being a purpose behind the amendment as equal to the mere existence of the militia itself being a purpose.
Having said that lets continue:
Moreover before considering how probable preserving the militia being a purpose, shouldn't it be first convincingly explained how that can be served through the action required by the amendment? The explanation provided by the court leaves one speechless because of how far it is from even the neighborhood of satisfying that.
Also lets not forget, the points here are in addition to what follows from the arms clause being always applicable if preserving the militia being a purpose leads to that.
No comments:
Post a Comment