Saturday, November 12, 2016

+67 (second amendment interpretation 45)

continuing from the preceding post
Is it possible to find in history another example of psychotic-like denial involving an entire nation like the situation with ignoring the status meaning in "being" in the second amendment here? Just like when a person takes a standstill position for an identification picture, they froze on that being to be one of their identification as a group. How could an entire nation be that blind just to reach a psychological satisfaction? Doesn't anybody look at the amendment and wonder what that "being" doing there? The status implication of that "being" may not be ignored coming from a person speaking on the spot in some social situation. So how about when it comes from a group like those people after taking the time to prepare both the ideas and the form of what they will say for a constitution?  
  


No comments: