+54 (second amendment interpretation 33)

I don't know why the second amendment should be targeted with interpretations chasing mysterious purposes as if we share no connection to make such thing with those who did. As if it is far from the minds of people trying to establish a system where people rule themselves to also think about making people also defend themselves in an environment empowering this choice like that. As if it is hard to think where there is such little difference in empowerment equipment between official forces and the public to make the larger one of those two domains in a free country its army. And the sad thing here is how the amendment itself reads as if it is actively saying there is no mysterious purpose here.