Friday, November 25, 2016

+76 (second amendment interpretation 54)

"Arms" in the congress version seems to make it easier than "arms" in the ratified version to know that we are not talking about weapons like a tank or a fighter jet, because it points at specific objects. Luckily, it seems that "Arms" is what we need to deal with because Amendments are created, according to the constitution, by the process of both being suggested by congress and ratified by the states. So, whether the ratified version was intended to identify the congress version or as a different version, "Arms" is what we get through either being the shared word or referring to a shared subset of "arms".    

No comments: