Wednesday, November 2, 2016

+53 (second amendment interpretation 32)

Related to post +50 and +51 below, last night I thought about how back then, unlike now, the biggest thing that makes government force capable of overpowering that of the public is that the first is organized and follow commands. With that it immediately came to my mind the thought: Hey wait a minuet..didn't they mention what fits that and also put it first thing in the amendment ("well regulated")?  

By the way, I think it was clear that in post +51 that the first sentence was intended to be:
It was sufficient to make the argument in the post below had the the part "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" in the amendment been followed by anything.  

No comments: