The actions of one individual are by default assumed to be built on a reasonable ground or a reasonable explanation needs to be provided for suggesting otherwise. That is for one individual. So how about if a number of those people at that time shared fear of the effect of government disarming the people on the militia's capability to resist the government or external enemy whether because of direct weakening through the disarmament or through the court's theory of its leading to elimination of the militia? Where is the reasonableness in seeing that dependency on the militia was built on a capability of the militia like that of our time relative to the machinery of this or an average military if it invades this country?
No comments:
Post a Comment