Instead of the way I argued for that "being necessary to the security of a free State" refers to the well regulated Militia as concept only, in the section titled Connecting Through The First Comma, couldn't I just said this:
The reference to a well regulated Militia at the beginning fits any well regulated Militia but the first comma blocks that reference from connecting to the "being necessary to the security of a free State" part following it. However the latter still try to refer to the former. This leads to that the "being necessary to the security of a free State" part refers to a well regulated Militia from the closest possible point which is its concept root.
No comments:
Post a Comment