Correcting the preceding post, it is actually the connection to that container plus a dependency meaning for the second comma, are what bring the whole process of generating the meaning of that text in the part before that comma from the root and not just the connection to that container.
Even if we assume that dependency was not intended for us to reason the connection between the two parts around the second comma it still would not affect that we are required to reason the necessity of the militia to a free State for our time. That is because this requirement comes from the part before the second comma by itself at least from after the snapshot provided with "being" whose continuity is dependent on the existence and does not come from the authority of the constitution.
Having an attachment only by the interface without dependency, the second comma would be just telling us that the two parts around it come together and "shall" would have only its mere future reference.
Even if we assume that dependency was not intended for us to reason the connection between the two parts around the second comma it still would not affect that we are required to reason the necessity of the militia to a free State for our time. That is because this requirement comes from the part before the second comma by itself at least from after the snapshot provided with "being" whose continuity is dependent on the existence and does not come from the authority of the constitution.
Having an attachment only by the interface without dependency, the second comma would be just telling us that the two parts around it come together and "shall" would have only its mere future reference.
No comments:
Post a Comment