+149 (second amendment interpretation 107)

Here is a better view to the Amendment. Starting out, why do we need to focus on the role of the second comma beyond that of bringing the two parts around it together without being part of either of them? Why don't we instead focus on those two parts themselves and realize their complete independence from each other in their existence in the Amendment? By containing no reference to each other, including through things like "because" or "therefore" or "for that reason" etc.,  each one of those two parts protects its active form existence in the Amendment and does not allow becoming dissolved in the resulted mixture. This active existence imply starting from the root of its creation when applying that part. With regard to the part before the second comma this requires going back to find the militia being necessary to the security of a free State at application time. Of course, only when those two parts exist together the part after the second comma would be applicable.