The effort to put the clarity to the level of saying "being necessary to the security of a free state" instead of just saying "being necessary" or even "being necessary to a free state" makes it even further away that they used "being" instead of "is" not caring enough about the difference or were more interested in the beauty of their expression. Doesn't this
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
look more beautiful and professional than this
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
?
No comments:
Post a Comment