continued from the preceding post
Or is it that I am a fool here for jumping directly to a deeper psychological level instead of first pointing out the conscious level of taking this amendment like a toy? Otherwise how could one explain never seeing anybody taking into account that the part between the first two commas maybe not just establishing but establishing at the present and questioning for the future at the same time? Were a use like in saying The pizza being hot, better eat it now to question the existence of the being hot status to future times not common enough to justify bringing such possibility? How could one take a behaviour at this shallow level as a serious effort? This probably needed to be put on top of what I wrote in the preceding post letting the latter refers only to the subsequent levels of dealing with the interpretation of this amendment.
Or is it that I am a fool here for jumping directly to a deeper psychological level instead of first pointing out the conscious level of taking this amendment like a toy? Otherwise how could one explain never seeing anybody taking into account that the part between the first two commas maybe not just establishing but establishing at the present and questioning for the future at the same time? Were a use like in saying The pizza being hot, better eat it now to question the existence of the being hot status to future times not common enough to justify bringing such possibility? How could one take a behaviour at this shallow level as a serious effort? This probably needed to be put on top of what I wrote in the preceding post letting the latter refers only to the subsequent levels of dealing with the interpretation of this amendment.
No comments:
Post a Comment