+235 (second amendment interpretation 180: Was this taken seriously to begin with?)

continued from the preceding post 
Or is it that I am a fool here for jumping directly to a deeper psychological level instead of first pointing out the conscious  level of taking this amendment like a toy? Otherwise how could one explain never seeing anybody taking into account that the part between the first two commas maybe not just establishing but establishing at the present and questioning for the future at the same time? Were a use like in saying The pizza being hot, better eat it now to question the existence of the being hot status to future times not common enough to justify bringing such possibility? How could one take a behaviour at this shallow level as a serious effort? This probably needed to be put on top of what I wrote in the preceding post letting the latter refers only to the subsequent levels of dealing with the interpretation of this amendment. 

+234 (second amendment interpretation 179: Pointing Out The Level of Abnormal Behaviour Here)

In case some are in confusion about this, let me state it clearly myself that not even in his dreams one can find in other fields of intellectual thinking, not even in a field as young as computer programming,  something as huge as what I have been arguing for the Second Amendment here, left open for him anywhere close to this. But look at what the psychological factor does. My desire to see what I am doing here as anywhere equivalent to even a little fraction of itself there intellectually is much bigger than any desire I could have to point out abnormal behaviour here, if there is any reasonable probability to see things otherwise but unfortunately there isn't.