+101 (second amendment interpretation 74)

Although my intention in writing the preceding post, and the earlier talk about "continuity connection", was to show using "right" like a filter that would not let things pass if the preceding part was applied on "being" not requiring continued existing in the status, that intention should not prevent an understanding limited to "right" directing how "being" should be taken from the construction stage of taking the Amendment.  
By the way, "the continuous having" in the preceding post should be replaced with "the continued having".