+82 (second amendment interpretation 60)

This maybe already reached from POST 78 but it is not a bad idea to point it out.

The right to self-defense is not the same as the right to have the capability of the right to self-defense. The proof for that is that for any empowerment intended for self-defense you can imagine some level at which it would be called crazy behaviour because there is no need for the taken precaution. Since there is an external factor involved, it must be excluded before, for example, denying somebody buying a gun can be called denying to his self-defense right.