Friday, May 2, 2014

Why the comma before "being" in the Congress Version - 4

One may also be able to add that the comma is not serving generalizing being necessary to the security of a free state on a "well regulated" militia but instead it is serving generalizing the absence of dependency of being necessary to the security of a free state on a "well regulated" militia.
Unlike the first generalization above, the second generalization is created with applying the amendment and without being dependent on ignoring or circumventing the limitations of "being".

No comments: