"being" is about being- 4 : Same thing expressed differently

I did not realize what I stated in #2 of this series ("being" is about being- 2: An Essential Distinction" ) until the date I posted it.So it shouldn't be a surprise if what I wrote previously do not fit with that. But that do not represent a problem or contradiction because it is only related to the forms of expressions I used not the content. In # 2 of this "being" series things were taken closer to their basic factors to help in understanding how the general applicability of the Constitution would fit. Otherwise, one may still chooses to express that side of the significance in using "being" with less granularity by using "time" to also include what satisfied "being" at that time and say that "being necessary to the security of free state" was intended for that time only.