If you want to sue someone in a different state the constitutional due process is interpreted in a way that requires the defendant to have made or agreed to make a contact with your state through which that defendant "availed" himself to your state. Otherwise, it is seen as unfair to bring that defendant to the courts of that state and make him the subject of a ruling from these courts.
This is very similar to why I criticize gun ownership. No other weapon empowers the killing and mass murdering of persons who did not avail themselves in any way to the attacker as much as a gun does.
No comments:
Post a Comment