As if never existed

Yesterday there was a news story about someone who shot a neighbor family and a person outside for no reason. This of course could be one example of others I did not hear about. Today you live like nothing happened and as if those killed never existed. I personally, still need to learn to be like you and accept the gun murdering of those who did not avail themselves to the aggressor in any way and treat it as if it is not only something under our control to prevent but also something we empowered to happen.

The title of this blog

In case anyone wonder why didn't I title this blog as "addicted to guns" instead of "drugged on guns" here is the answer. While not being a native speaker makes me often miss clear things related to the use of the language this was not one of those situations. I used "drugged" instead of  "addicted" because it better represents my position in calling for us to mature into a gun free society. For that purpose the word "drugged" sounded to me as a better choice since the word "addicted" seems to be more suitable for things that could be a problem only if over used which is not my position toward guns in this country. 

Due process and gun victims

If you want to sue someone in a different state the constitutional due process is interpreted in a way that requires the defendant to have made or agreed to make a contact with your state through which that defendant "availed" himself to your state. Otherwise, it is seen as unfair to bring that defendant to the courts of that state and make him the subject of a ruling from these courts.

This is very similar to why I criticize gun ownership. No other weapon empowers the killing and mass murdering of persons who did not avail themselves in any way to the attacker as much as a gun does.
　

Empowering killing and disabling suing

If you want to sue someone in this country you may have to bring the complaint to the defendant close enough to poke his eye with it. If you want to kill someone ,on the other hand, the law here empowers you to own a device that can make you do that easily and without getting close to the victim or having his attention.

Safeguarding my freedom of expression

 In order to protect my freedom of expression I reserved an address on the web I can use if I want to.

That address is: www.uemcs.com
It is currently empty.

20 weeks abortion? You must be kidding?

It is some times needed to have an external view. I heard in where I came from some people say that after or from 40 days of pregnancy it is religiously forbidden. Remember that is at a time and/or area where pregnancy tests were far from being available as they are here in these days.

In any case why would any woman needs 20 weeks to discover that she is pregnant and make that decision? In comparison, when a man does an act that may lead to creating a life he has made his choice and do not have even one second of additional time to undo his choice not to mention days or weeks.

To those gun enthusiastic legislators working against such thing I say If I was in your place I wouldn't even accept being one second with the side that allow such thing to happen but I also want to ask you this. So you think that you need to protect a potential victim despite the mother-child general emotional connection but you accept empowering the taking of lives of potential victims by those who generally do not have any emotional connection with them through your gun ownership and the wide spread of that killing device?